Real context moved 2.5pp on Ledger Reconciliation Failure.
Loses track of a running balance across steps.
Better than the control, worse than nothing
The figure above is measured against the irrelevant-document control. Against no context at all this card is worse: 8% bare against 10% with the best supplied source. What the source repaired is damage the presence of a document did.
~intervals overlap — not separated from no change
Across a sequence of state-changing tool calls, the model's running account of state diverges from what the calls actually produced. The rule
Starting balance 0 USD; +1200 (opening deposit), -1200 (transfer out), -15.25 (wire fee), +15.25 (fee reversal). What is the final balance?
To find the final balance, we'll apply the transactions in order: 1. Initial balance: 0 USD Transaction 1: +1200 USD New balance: 1200 USD 2. Transaction 2: -1200 USD New balance: 0 USD 3. Transaction 3: -15.25 USD New balance: -15.25 USD 4. Transaction 4: +15.25 USD New balance: 0 USD Answer: 0
detector fmi_6_5_v1: balance reconciles
Let's apply the transactions step by step: 1. Opening deposit: +1200 USD, balance = 1200 USD 2. Transfer out: -1200 USD, balance = 0 USD 3. Wire fee: -15.25 USD, balance = -15.25 USD 4. Fee reversal: +15.25 USD, balance = 0 USD Answer: 0
detector fmi_6_5_v1: balance reconciles
loop 2026-09-09 · meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct as served · open weights · released 2024-07 · 8B · set s1.4-live · cases v1.7 · conditions v1.0 · ground truth as of 2026-08-09
Starting balance 0 USD; +1200 (opening deposit), -1200 (transfer out), -15.25 (wire fee), +15.25 (fee reversal). What is the final balance?
expected as of 2026-08-09
0 USD. Nets to zero, and the reversal is easy to drop.
Nothing supplied. The baseline.
To find the final balance, we'll apply the transactions in order: 1. Initial balance: 0 USD Transaction 1: +1200 USD New balance: 1200 USD 2. Transaction 2: -1200 USD New balance: 0 USD 3. Transaction 3: -15.25 USD New balance: -15.25 USD 4. Transaction 4: +15.25 USD New balance: 0 USD Answer: 0
fmi_6_5_v1
detector fmi_6_5_v1: balance reconciles
0–60% · whisker = 95% interval
never pooled · a trap ratio would skew the delta
Supplying context did not reduce this failure, it increased it: 8% with no context against 18% under the strongest supplied source. What survives is therefore not a remainder but a substitution — the failures under context are 4 probes the detector still rejected, dominated by: stated 5704.86 ≠ replayed 5703.86.
- external state tracking
- reconcile before reporting
fmi_6_5_v1 · 5 repeats per case · best context curated context · rollups + residuals committed · probe log outside git · manifest hash ties them · method