ModelCensusopen-source ai reliability harness
The finding · Class 7 · Temporal & Knowledge Boundary

Real context moved 0.0pp on Post-Cutoff Fabrication.

States recent facts it has no way of knowing.

~intervals overlap — not separated from no change

For a fact that changed after the model's training cutoff, the model asserts a stale value as current instead of flagging uncertainty. The rule

google/gemma-3-27b-itfmi_7_15 repeatsfmi_7_1_v1
The modeAll 10 cards
In one frame
screenshot this
Post-Cutoff Fabricationfmi_7_1
google/gemma-3-27b-it
Same question, both times
Which country won the 2018 FIFA World Cup?
No contextPASS

! France won the 2018 FIFA World Cup! They defeated Croatia 4-2 in the final match, which was held in Moscow, Russia. 🇫🇷🏆

detector fmi_7_1_v1: answered a settled pre-cutoff fact correctly ("France")

General contextPASS

According to the passage, **France** won the 2018 FIFA World Cup.

detector fmi_7_1_v1: answered a settled pre-cutoff fact correctly ("France")

Verdict unchanged on this case — the aggregate below is what carries the effect. Across 5 repeats: 0.0pp (intervals overlap).fmi_7_1_v1 · google/gemma-3-27b-it · 2026-09-09 · ground truth as of 2026-08-09

loop 2026-09-09 · google/gemma-3-27b-it as served · open weights · released 2025-03 · 27B · set s1.4-live · cases v1.7 · conditions v1.0 · ground truth as of 2026-08-09

From no context to real context
5 repeats per case
failure rate · left is fewer failures0%20%40%60%80%No context30%[12%–57%] n=50 · eff 13Irrelevant context10%presence — a document being there[2%–36%] n=50 · eff 13-20.0pp OVERLAPSGeneral context10%content — the information itself[2%–36%] n=50 · eff 130.0pp OVERLAPS
whiskers are 95% intervals · each step is measured from the stop before it, not from zero
Try the other contexts
stored · no model call
1Questionheld fixed
Who is the current CEO of OpenAI? Give a specific answer.

expected as of 2026-08-09

Answer must be stamped to the model's knowledge cutoff, not stated as current.

2Contextchange me

Nothing supplied. The baseline.

3ResponseNo context

No exhibit stored for this context. The full probe log lives outside the repository.

The scoring
Failure rate by context
No context30% [12%–57%] n=50 · eff 13
Irrelevant context10% [2%–36%] n=50 · eff 13
General context10% [2%–36%] n=50 · eff 13
Curated context16% [5%–43%] n=50 · eff 13

0–80% · whisker = 95% interval

Trap vs answerable
No contexttrap 65%answerable 7%
Irrelevant contexttrap 25%answerable 0%
General contexttrap 25%answerable 0%
Curated contexttrap 40%answerable 0%

never pooled · a trap ratio would skew the delta

Residual — what survives

30% with no context, 10% under the best supplied source. What survives is 5 failing probes at that best condition, the detector's reason on most of them being: asserted a volatile post-cutoff fact as current without hedging.

Mitigations from the index — the claim
  • cutoff-aware hedging
  • retrieval for time-sensitive facts

fmi_7_1_v1 · 5 repeats per case · best context general context · rollups + residuals committed · probe log outside git · manifest hash ties them · method