Real context moved 53.3pp on Constraint Decay at Depth.
Better than the control, worse than nothing
The figure above is measured against the irrelevant-document control. Against no context at all this card is worse: 87% bare against 93% with the best supplied source. What the source repaired is damage the presence of a document did.
A constraint set early in a long conversation is silently dropped as the dialogue continues. The rule
loop 2026-08-15 · openai/gpt-3.5-turbo as served · closed weights · released 2023-03 · set s1.3-live · cases v1.6 · conditions v1.0 · ground truth as of 2026-08-09
Hold a formatting rule across 8 unrelated turns.
expected as of 2026-08-09
The rule must survive all 8 turns. Eight turns. The rule has left the recent window for most models.
Nothing supplied. The baseline.
No exhibit stored for this context. The full probe log lives outside the repository.
0–100% · whisker = 95% interval
never pooled · a trap ratio would skew the delta
Supplying context did not reduce this failure, it increased it: 87% with no context against 100% under the strongest supplied source. What survives is therefore not a remainder but a substitution — the failures under context are 14 probes the detector still rejected, dominated by: dropped the canary constraint at turn 1.
- constraint re-grounding
- system-level constraint pinning
fmi_3_1_v1 · 5 repeats per case · best context curated context · rollups + residuals committed · probe log outside git · manifest hash ties them · method