ModelCensusopen-source ai reliability harness
The finding · Class 4 · Reasoning & Calculation

Real context moved 0.0pp on Dimensional-Analysis Failure.

~intervals overlap — not separated from no change

The model produces a quantity with inconsistent or wrong units, or mixes unit systems, yielding a dimensionally invalid result. The rule

mistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instructfmi_4_45 repeatsfmi_4_4_v1
In one frame
screenshot this
Dimensional-Analysis Failurefmi_4_4
mistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instruct
Same question, both times
A tank fills at 3 L/min for 4 minutes, then drains at 500 mL/s for 10 seconds. Net litres?
No contextPASS

To determine the net amount of liquid in the tank after the filling and draining processes, we'll calculate each process separately and then find the difference. 1. **Filling the tank:** - **Rate:** 3 L/min - **Time:** 4 minutes - **Volume filled:** \( 3 \, \text{L/min} \times 4 \, \text{min} = 12 \, \text{L} \) 2. **Draining the tank:** - **Rate:** 500 mL/s - **Time:** 10 seconds - **Volume drained:** \( 500 \, \text{mL/s} \times 10 \, \text{s} = 5000 \, \text{mL} \) - Convert mL to L: \( 5000 \, \text{mL} = 5 \, \text{L} \) 3. **Net volume:** - **Net volume:** \( 12 \, \text{L} - 5 \, \text{L} = 7 \, \text{L} \) Answer: 7 L

detector fmi_4_4_v1: correct unit L

General contextPASS

To solve the problem, we need to calculate the net amount of liquid in the tank after it has been filled and then drained. We'll do this by calculating the amount of liquid added during the filling phase and subtracting the amount of liquid removed during the draining phase. 1. **Filling Phase:** - Rate: 3 L/min - Time: 4 minutes - Amount filled: \( 3 \, \text{L/min} \times 4 \, \text{min} = 12 \, \text{L} \) 2. **Draining Phase:** - Rate: 500 mL/s - Time: 10 seconds - First, convert the rate to litres per second: \( 500 \, \text{mL/s} = 0.5 \, \text{L/s} \) - Amount drained: \( 0.5 \, \text{L/s} \times 10 \, \text{s} = 5 \, \text{L} \) 3. **Net Amount:** - Net litres: \( 12 \, \text{L} - 5 \, \text{L} = 7 \, \text{L} \) Answer: 7 L

detector fmi_4_4_v1: correct unit L

Verdict unchanged on this case — the aggregate below is what carries the effect. Across 5 repeats: 0.0pp (intervals overlap).fmi_4_4_v1 · mistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instruct · 2026-08-15 · ground truth as of 2026-08-09

loop 2026-08-15 · mistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instruct as served · open weights · released 2025-06 · 24B · set s1.3-live · cases v1.6 · conditions v1.0 · ground truth as of 2026-08-09

From no context to real context
5 repeats per case
failure rate · left is fewer failures0%5%10%15%20%No context0%[0%7%] n=50Irrelevant context0%presence — a document being there[0%7%] n=500.0pp OVERLAPSGeneral context0%content — the information itself[0%7%] n=500.0pp OVERLAPS
whiskers are 95% intervals · each step is measured from the stop before it, not from zero
Try the other contexts
stored · no model call
1Questionheld fixed
A tank fills at 3 L/min for 4 minutes, then drains at 500 mL/s for 10 seconds. Net litres?

expected as of 2026-08-09

12 L in, 5 L out, net 7 L. The mixed units are the trap.

2Contextchange me

Nothing supplied. The baseline.

3ResponseNo context
PASS

To determine the net amount of liquid in the tank after the filling and draining processes, we'll calculate each process separately and then find the difference. 1. **Filling the tank:** - **Rate:** 3 L/min - **Time:** 4 minutes - **Volume filled:** \( 3 \, \text{L/min} \times 4 \, \text{min} = 12 \, \text{L} \) 2. **Draining the tank:** - **Rate:** 500 mL/s - **Time:** 10 seconds - **Volume drained:** \( 500 \, \text{mL/s} \times 10 \, \text{s} = 5000 \, \text{mL} \) - Convert mL to L: \( 5000 \, \text{mL} = 5 \, \text{L} \) 3. **Net volume:** - **Net volume:** \( 12 \, \text{L} - 5 \, \text{L} = 7 \, \text{L} \) Answer: 7 L

fmi_4_4_v1

detector fmi_4_4_v1: correct unit L

The scoring
Failure rate by context
No context0% [0%7%] n=50
Irrelevant context0% [0%7%] n=50
General context0% [0%7%] n=50
Curated context0% [0%7%] n=50

0–20% · whisker = 95% interval

Trap vs answerable
No contexttrap 0%answerable 0%
Irrelevant contexttrap 0%answerable 0%
General contexttrap 0%answerable 0%
Curated contexttrap 0%answerable 0%

never pooled · a trap ratio would skew the delta

Residual — what survives

Unchanged by context: 0% with none, 0% with the strongest supplied source. For a control mode that flat line is the result — it is what licenses reading movement elsewhere in this loop as grounding rather than as a document being present. Nothing survives at the best condition on the cases measured here.

Mitigations from the index — the claim
  • explicit unit tracking
  • dimensional checkers

fmi_4_4_v1 · 5 repeats per case · best context general context · rollups + residuals committed · probe log outside git · manifest hash ties them · method